JUDICIALIZATION AS A PHENOMENON OF MODERN DEMOCRACIES 337 283

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56579/verum.v3i1.800

Keywords:

Judicialization, Democracy

Abstract

This research primarily focuses on studying judicialization and its relationship/contribution to democracy. Since the study of this topic is quite diverse, the investigation is organized around two guiding axes: the substantive explanatory axis, which will be explored from the perspective of two important authors representing this approach, namely Ronald Dworkin and Mauro Cappelletti; and the procedural analytical axis, which will be examined in this theoretical essay through the perspectives of authors Antoine Garapon and Jürgen Habermas. Therefore, the general objective of this theoretical essay is to study the phenomenon of judicialization from the substantive explanatory and procedural analytical perspectives. The research problem is centered on questioning whether judicialization is a phenomenon of contemporary democracies. The methodology is deductive and uses bibliographic research of a qualitative nature, developed through the search for national publications in electronic databases such as Google Scholar and Scielo, as well as books and journals that focus on the study of the proposed theme.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Aline Rodrigues Maroneze, Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul

    PhD candidate in Human Rights at Unijuí. Full CAPES/PDPG scholarship holder - Postgraduate Development Program (PDPG) Emergency Program for Strategic Consolidation of Stricto Sensu Academic Postgraduate Programs (PPGs) with grades 3 and 4 from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES). Member of the Research Group registered with CNPQ "Human Rights and Social Movements in Multicultural Society," linked to the Master's and Doctoral Law Program at the Regional Integrated University of Upper Uruguay and Missions (URI), Santo Ângelo/RS campus. Master's in Law from the Regional Integrated University of Upper Uruguay and Missions - URI, Santo Ângelo/RS campus (2023). Master's in Development and Public Policy from the Federal University of Southern Border, Cerro Largo/RS campus (2020). Postgraduate in Civil Procedural Law from Unintter (2016). Holds a Bachelor's degree in Law from the Regional Integrated University of Upper Uruguay and Missions (2011). Lawyer, registered with OAB/RS under number 86.479. E-mail: aline_maroneze@yahoo.com.br

  • Serli Genz Bölter, Federal University of Fronteira Sul

    Postdoctoral in Law (UFSC), PhD in Sociology from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS, 2013), Master's in Education in the Sciences, Law Area (UNIJUI, 1999), Bachelor's in Law from the Regional University of Northwestern Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI, 1994). Professor at the Federal University of the Southern Border (UFFS). Professor in the Postgraduate Program in Development and Public Policies (UFFS). She works in the areas of General Theory of Law and Sociology of Law, with research topics including: foundations of law; judicialization; social movements; and environmental law. E-mail: serli.bolter@uffs.edu.br

References

BARROSO, Luis Roberto. Curso de Direito Constitucional Contemporâneo: os conceitos fundamentais e a construção do novo modelo. 5.ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2015.

_____.Da Falta de Efetividade à Judicialização Excessiva: direito à saúde, fornecimento gratuito de medicamentos e parâmetros para a atuação judicial. Disponível em: https://www.conjur.com.br/dl/estudobarroso.pdf. Acesso em: 09 set 2019.

______. Judicialização, ativismo judicial e legitimidade democrática. Disponível em: https://www.direitofranca.br/direitonovo/FKCEimagens/file/ArtigoBarroso_para_Selecao.pdfAcesso: em 09 set 2019.

BONAVIDES. Paulo. Curso de Direito Constitucional. 26. ed. São Paulo: Malheiros Editores, 2011.

CAPPELLETTI, Mauro. Juízes Legisladores? Tradução de Carlos Alberto Álvaro de Oliveira. Porto Alegre: Sérgio Antonio Fabris Editor, 1999.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Levando os direitos a sério. Tradução de Jefferson Luiz Camargo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2005.

_____. O Império do Direito. Tradução de Jefferson Luiz Camargo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.

GARAPON, Antoine. O juiz e a democracia: O guardião das promessas. Tradução de

Maria Luiza de Carvalho. Rio de Janeiro: Revan, 2001.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. Direito e Democracia – entre facticidade e validade. vol. I e II. Tradução de Flávio Beno Siebeneichler. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 2003.

_____. O discurso filosófico da modernidade: doze lições. Tradução Luiz Sergio Repa e Rodnei Nascimento. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002.

_____.Teoria de la acción comunicativa. Traducción Manuel Jiménez Redondo. Madrid: Editorial Trotta, 2010.

SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. Para uma revolução democrática da justiça. 3ª ed. São Paulo : Cortez, 2008.

¬¬STRECK, Lênio Luiz; MORAIS, José Luis Bolzan de. OAB in foco. Uberlândia, ano 4, n. 20, 2009.

VIANNA, Luiz Werneck et al. A judicialização da política e das relações sociais no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Renavan, 1999.

VIANNA, Luiz Werneck. Dezessete Anos da Judicialização da Política. São Paulo: Tempo Social, v. 19 n°. 2, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20702007000200002

Published

2023-09-11

How to Cite

JUDICIALIZATION AS A PHENOMENON OF MODERN DEMOCRACIES. (2023). VERUM: Journal of Scientific Initiation , 3(1), 52-68. https://doi.org/10.56579/verum.v3i1.800